Friday, December 20, 2013

The Weeks Hamlet Took Over

  Hamlet. My first impression when I received my copy was, good lord. I never knew Shakespeare had a large text published and quite frankly, I was a little apprehensive to dig into its pages. Maybe. But the fact is that I did it. We  did it. And I should probably give a big thanks to Sparknotes...thank you.

   We've watched a good number of adaptations of Hamlet in these last few weeks and there have been some I've liked and some I haven't liked. After the last page was finished in the Hamlet text we began our movie watching with the Branagh Hamlet. In this version I had a problem with  certain characters and character appearances. The men  were all so very old and bleached out looking that their appearances instilled in me the state of corruption that Elsinore was in. Creepy. Perhaps this was the point, but I had trouble connecting with the characters and the story line of the play. This could also have to do with the fact that I hadn't began annotations yet. My bad. Ophelia bugged me in most of the productions, but in this one and the Tenant production the most as I wanted more than anything for the actors playing her character to try a bit harder. I guess they felt a bit weak to me. On another note, the ghost in this production was probably the most terrifying to me as the scene set up between the ghost  and Hamlet occurred  in such  an ominous  way that I felt and saw the forces of darkness warring with the Earth as Hamlet hurried to keep up with his dead father.If the theory that the ghost is not heaven-sent is true then this scene works well to showcase the dark revengeful state of old Hamlet and the possibility that Hamlet's power came from Satan instead of God.  

    The Tenant Hamlet version was the more comical production as it dealt with the state of Hamlet's obvious insanity  and the constant suspicion and spying that transpired within the mansion walls, especially with the genius use of security cameras to indicate these issues. I don't know how discussions went in other classes, but in my class we discussed the importance of the stairs in the Olivier Hamlet. The higher up the characters ascend the closer in proximity they are to heaven and God and the lower they descend the closer they are to hell and its  ruler Satan. As I did my annotations I saw more clearly Hamlet's struggle to be decisive and to figure out if his power to purge the world-Elsinore- of Claudius's evils were ordained from God himself or from some other less heavenly power. Also in this production, we saw Gertrude deliberately take a big gulp of the poisoned cup in order to pick/side/ protect her son. I would like to think Shakespeare meant for this to happen. I mean Gertrude loved her son and remained concerned for his mad/plaintive state throughout the course of the play. For her to choose Hamlet and leave her temptation-Claudius-makes for a much more interesting viewing.

   Although Jacobi is a talented actor, his production of Hamlet did not bode well with me.Terrible of me, I know. But well,  I felt less engaged watching this film and although it was more traditional, I felt  it progressed slowly and well dryly...well the incest bit was out there and far from dull, but that's another matter. I would have liked to see more discussion over this film as I thought we focused  more on the Hawke production.  This production, although displaying a more peaceful ghost, most likely heaven-sent, didn't stick in my mind that much either. I did like the actress who played Ophelia though. Her "I'm crazy" scene was quite moving.

    Recently we read an article by Philip Edwards, the "Tragic Balance in Hamlet", which helped me to realize that I was actually sympathizing for Hamlet.What?  The David Tenant documentary asked me to consider all that Hamlet  had suffered and I did, feeling sorry for the poor kid. Oh wait, thirty-year old grown man. Sure, his dad was murdered and most of us would think of revenge if the same were to happen to us, but Hamlet's right does not make his actions a moral right. Murder is murder. Both Claudius and Hamlet are guilty. Guilty. How can they not be, Edwards, as you "praise" Claudius in your essay?

    Now I have to consider all the books  and movies I've ever read or seen in my life where the protagonist has been wronged by the antagonist. You know how many times I've sat reading a book or  watching a movie waiting for that bloody scene were justice is served? WAY  too many times. This folks shows the shift in values. Our modern culture  has changed us humans so much that  we(well me) can sit without a thought watching the most gory video jumping up and down, cringing, rooting for, whatever, for the evil  doer to be brought to death. It's crazy how I don't take time to think about these things. I think "well he tried to kill that guy with a gun and ended up dying himself, too bad for him....should have been more careful. Karma gets ya."  But really, how do we have the power to say  God has given us the divine right to rid the world of evils? I don't want to be a usurper of some possible deity like Hamlet. I'm human. A tiny individual. What do we know? And there's this problem-evil cannot just be allowed to continue on without the care of those who are innocent. We like  our happy endings after all.




Sunday, December 15, 2013

Prompt Time

2006 Open Prompt-Country Setting as a Source of Values

Student 3A
  As I write this first post I have yet to read the AP Reader's commentary, and so my thoughts... So far the flow of this student essay is quite simple and easily understandable as he/she considers Jane Austen's Persuasion. As I read I am far from intimidated as this student analyzes the influence of the country setting-UpperCross. In his/her thesis this student argues that Jane Austen uses this rural setting to help impact the character development of the plain yet  intelligent main character, Anne  by endowing "her countryside with a nurturing, virtuous, and peaceful quality." This essay contains well developed body paragraphs agruing the appeal Uppercross brings to Anne and the growth she experiences in the small area, as she is indeed far from the city Bath that judges her more harshly. And the score... was a lovely 8. I can agree with this score because this student provides the details in his/her paragraphs to show how Uppercross supports and welcomes Anne's "qualities of intelligence, kindness and modesty...  " Also, direct sentences and colloquial type diction help benefit the reader to the student's argument that in Uppercross's  "the reader better understands Anne's qualities, for she is constantly undergoing self-reflection and self-examination..."

Student 3B
   Immediately I became a bit concerned while reading  the introductory paragraph of this essay where this student introduces two settings. Sure, he/she has the intent to contrast the influence that both  the countryside  and city settings have upon main character Jack, but his/her observance that the city is just  as influencing as the countryside is left briefly in a sentence without being further expanded upon. To further clarify in  quote, "He[Jack] lives lives a life by the name of Earnest in the city..." That's it. Fortunately, in the following body
paragraphs the student further illustrates how both settings play a role in Jack's life providing the details to point out how Jack struggles to live between his two lives. The life in the city with his
fiancée and his life in the countryside with his family members. Although this student provides this information, he/she fails to accurately take from the text the necessary values that are needed to answer the prompt. The countryside being a needed safe haven for Jack is not enough. I was further concerned with this essay when the student tried to tie in "comedic confusion" into the prompt. Honestly, I didn't see the point and in no way did the random argument help to support his/her thesis. This essay received a 6.

Student 3C
  Alright the first sentence of this introductory paragraph urged me to read on...but  then I read the thesis. "Such happens on William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying". "Such" being that settings allow certain characters to establish values. And I'm assuming here that that is the desired message. As you can tell from the thesis, very underdeveloped, as is the rest of this essay. All this student had to do here was include a couple noteworthy values and they may have raised their score of a 4 to a possible 5. The next paragraph of this essay, in an out of the blue fashion, attempts to link stream of consciousness to setting. I am more than confused at this moment because so far this student has yet introduce a character or a setting. And so I'm thinking, not good. But then he/she finally introduces the setting to be the backward south of the United States from years past. This student  then introduces three characters, Dewey Dell, little Vardaman, and Anse, who all display some  backwardness of the south but in introducing three characters the organization of this essay becomes a hectic and trying read as readers try to understand how the setting of the story supports the entire work and these so-called  backward values.

Thursday, December 5, 2013

"Death From the Skies!" Close Reading

   Link

 It's not often that a title births the need for one to do a double-take, and yet in this article's title "Death From the  Skies!" by Nicholas Duchesne, such a feat is most certainly achieved,  allowing one to eagerly continue reading . As of recently brown tree snakes have become a nuance to the animal species and human inhabitants of Guam, eliciting the cry for change . In an effort to decrease these lethal snakes, poison mice have been dropped into  Guam's jungles to reduce and eliminate the harm that's already been done.And through his  engaging style, Duchesne uses literary techniques such as: diction, details, and syntax to describe the measures that are being taken to underwhelm Guam  of it's current brown tree snake population.

   The use of diction in this article although largely colloquial, does at times play with the informal diction to add more emphasis  to the overall message, that being  the need to destroy these brown tree snakes. For example when Duchesne writes: "After the seemingly tasty snack is dropped on their arboreal doorstep, the snakes choke down their medicine," the weight of the word "arboreal" immediately catches a readers eye. In this sentence it serves to specify the habitat of these snakes. Their location is key to where these poison mice need to be dropped in order to have the desired affect. More interestingly, to describe the type of mice, in this particular sentence Duchesne writes: "Dead neonatal mice." Despite being young, these mice are most likely easily accessible and small, and therefore an  important  poison sacrifice adding to the effort to rid Guam of brown tree snakes. From there the everyday language becomes dominate where Duchesne plants recognizable words such as:  war, invasive, and culprits to lesson ones view on brown tree snakes. They are harming the jungles and these aforementioned words help to place them in the wrong.

 Without details a reader would not be  able to comprehend the severity that these brown tree snakes present to Guam's native species population and economy. To alarm readers, Duchsene's details focus on numbers in order to factually relate the dangers of these snakes. He writes: "Though relatively harmless to humans, the tree-dwelling snakes have devastated Guam’s jungle ecology,driving eight species of native birds extinct. They also are the frequent culprits behind power outages on the island, which they trigger by wriggling into power substations." From this information a reader easily understands the trouble these snakes initiate and to know that they've wiped out eight bird species, creates a concern for those readers who value bird populations. And then when Duchesne relays the information that "Within 60 hours the snakes, which grow to between 3 and 6 feet in length, are dead," from the poison pills, relief is palpable and some assurance in these poison mice ensues.

  Syntax works to create pauses in this article and to add more excitement, more so in the areas  where Duchesne asks a question. Fragments and the occasional question in these sentences, "Their cargo? Dead neonatal mice. Their mission? Get eaten," have this build up affect. Question? Pause, and the reader considers and wonders, "Whatever could the solution be?" Also, these shorter sentences benefit in keeping the reader's focus in order to keep their attention on how these brown tree snakes are being taken out throughout the entire article. Punctuation also shows up in the position of commas, especially in this sentence, "The parachutes, however, are made of cardboard and green tissue paper, and they’re designed to get snared in tree branches." These commas create effective pauses drawing the intended message in the role that the cardboard and tissue paper play to reach the infamous brown tree snakes.

   The role of diction, details, and syntax in this editorial article by Nicholas Duchesne allow for the creative message that poison-pill mice have currently been working to decrease the brown snake population in Guam. These techniques help to support this article's focus on the irritatingly harmful brown tree snakes and the even more harmful poison mice that have been dropped into Guam jungles. One is easily enraptured and interested by this article and because of these literary techniques, the reader has no issue articulating the message of this short piece.

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Beyond The Course Material

     Back again and its snowing. Great...so I guess I'll  start now. Recently we've been exercising our brains with discussions over diction and syntax.  I find these discussions to be beneficial because I'm forced to focus on a single word or a method of  syntax to see how it all adds emphasis to the passage. In addition to this, I find that I enjoy creating my own imitation of the passage with my peers. This last part always ends up being quite satisfying for me because as a class we get to put our awareness of the prompt into words, in an attempt to reflect it. Another helpful learning tool is the "mood and atmosphere" exercises. Although they are benefiting to moi, they end up taking an unbearably long time to complete. I'm shocked at the amount of time it takes to pick out a mood. FOREVER. But I've come to accept it. As a writer I never pick a random word to throw into my stories. Every word matters. It's like a human life. Every expression, pause, action. Everything. It can be annoying, but the time spent finding the as-best-to-perfect-as-your-going-to-get-passage is rewarding. It's true. As a class, once we've come to a consensus, the actual build up of our paragraph takes less time. Thank you stars. As I read other works from my favorite authors, Rae Carson, Cassandra Clare, and  Moira Young, my eyes isolate important passages allowing me to think, What if he/she had taken out this word and chosen to simply choose the elementary words? There would be no affect. I wouldn't be able to throw the book across the room because a major character had died. I wouldn't feel the anticipation that the characters feel. An author works to make his/her readers feel. As the reader I like to be taken completely.Nothing else matters. Chores? Nope. If I can't demand myself to put the book down, the author has done a superb job.
   Within these exercises we spent a class hour practicing our multiple choice. Guess what? I'm getting better. Yes! Or maybe they were easier passages. Darn. Or maybe it's because of all I've learned so far. If I could write in the booklets I would, but instead I mentally underline and circle the words that I deem to be important. I've also found that doing a quick first reading is helpful and as a result brings up my scores. In the past I've destroyed my performance by doing multiple close readings to try and understand the gibberish that I'm reading. So, there's the growth.
   And then there's Shakespeare's Hamlet. To be honest I don't know how we're going to have a class discussions on this text. It twas  kind o' difficult with all thee thou's and dost's and wilt's. Maybe after we've watched different interpretations of the play? Hopefully, no, I'm sure I'll have a better understanding of this play after annotations and Sparknotes. Ha! The difficulty at this moment rests with Hamlet.  By having one of the major speaking roles, I found it difficult to connect with my character and the others in this work. I blame the language now. Sorry, I have to point  a finger. Instinct. In consideration of the play though, Shakespeare, yet again creates a tragic plot. People were dying left and right. Tis Shakespeare's way. There's always something up with the monarchy.

Friday, November 15, 2013

And the prompt Is?

Open Prompt-Question 3 2003
Tragic Figures as Instruments of the Suffering of Others

Student LLLL:
      For the limited amount of time provided this  student responded pretty, I feel, articulately. Then again, they did receive a 9. He/She seemed well educated in F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby enough to be able to piece through the events to consider Jay Gatsby's moments of personal, inner-personal, and societal tragedy. Not only did this student fill  this essay with plenty of well chosen details(ex.the fall of Gatsby to the fall of Roaring 20's) to show these forms of tragedy, they also used strong diction to add intelligence to his/her essay.Words, for example being, dichotomy, subsequent, decadence, malicious  In addition to the aforementioned,  the sentence structuring incorporated a strong use of syntax, especially in the longer sentences where  he/she worked with punctuation to add a flow. The use of commas benefited by separating out the details. An example of a long sentence being: "At the very end of the novel, Nick explains how Gatsby 'believed in the green light,' or the happier future  mankind strives for , though we are 'boats against the current born back to the past'." And so I'm led think, wow. As the readers comment, "The analysis is provided with insight and stylistic flair."

Student C:
    Not as creative. Plain language. Less developed. And really really hard to read. This student wrote about the tragedy of King Lear befallen upon him by pride, sense of duty, and vanity. The student did well in briefly introducing the less than perfect family dynamics between King Lear and his three daughters, done simply by explaining what befell upon King Lear and his daughters because of pride, duty, and vanity. The  first body paragraph and the smaller second summarizes the plot but unfortunately remains  focused only on how  pride and suffering brought destruction to King Lear and other influential characters. The last body paragraph is on King Lear's vanity. To note, the flaw rests in that this student didn't identify how all three work in an event. They are separate from each other in this essay, and although I haven't read  about King Lear's tragedy, I'm sure all three must play into the same events. Reading this essay makes me feel like I'm not learning anything new. For example, when this student is analyzing how out of all three of his daughters, Cordelia  rejects the opportunity to flatter her dad because of some inheritance, saying that King Lear's pride is broken. Yeah, his pride is wounded. What else is new?

Student FF:
     The "thesis" is atrocious. Gosh, I should stop judging, but really, "Ken Kelsey's novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest portrays Patrick Randal McMurphy's  as a tragic hero. But he is not the only one that suffers-his actions result in the suffering of others as well." And thats it folks. That's the introductory paragraph. I guess it's up to the reader to figure out why this McMurphy is a tragic hero. Or one could read on...because  the writer believes it's McMurphy's inability to conform. In regards to the analysis, the majority of this essay is spent describing the events that transpired in this novel, all in the effort to show how McMurphy brings upon the suffering of others. I feel like this student should have elaborated  on McMurphy's inability to conform instead of  escaping with, "McMurphy would not conform to the hospital  society that Ratched controlled & in the end he was met w/ destruction." Not so sure about the short hand bit, but do you see what I mean? And then this student brings up "The Combine" all of a sudden, which by the way was like, uhh where did this come from? Instead of explaining what "The Combine" is in the beginning, the writer surprises his readers,  indicating that he/she either  didn't really understand how to include "The Combine" or just plain didn't t know how to organize his/her essay in that moment. I enjoy the reader's comments about  McMurphy's infliction of suffering on others and how this writer, "...neglects to explore the possibility that McMurphy  also brought  these characters joy." I never thought of that. But, I have to agree. McMurphy must have had fun with these characters too. So then is he really tragic?

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Another Day Another Summary

Death of A Salesman: Arthur Miller (October 17, 1915 – February 10, 2005)
    - American playwright and essayist influential in the American theatre. In his early life, Miller majored in journalism at the University of Michigan before switching to English. After this, Miller studied playwriting. He received numerous awards for his well-known plays: The Crucible, All My Sons, A View From the Bridge, etc. His play Death of a Salesman,  included, received a handful of awards, one being the Pulitzer Prize for Drama(Wikipedia...yeah I know, but could they have seriously oops'd a biography?).

Significant Characters:

Willy Loman-Main character considered to be by  critics  a representation of the "Tragic Hero" He is hopeless without knowing that he is hopeless. He is a salesman who works to sell the products of his company, but ultimately , one learns that the product Willy is selling is himself. Willy is blatantly delusional, evidenced by his determination to be well-liked(no one really likes him). And as overworked as he is, he still wants to succeed and climb the social ladder from the lower-class life he has been living. Due to the  unfortunate decisions Willy made in the past, he tends to fixate on the past and the present frequently throughout the play.
 
Linda- Married to Willy. Comes off as a weak and submissive female, at times by allowing Willy to out speak her during certain occasions of physical and verbal abuse. Although she know Willy has attempted to kill himself and has proof with the  rubber tube, Linda does nothing more than fret to her sons about Willy's deteriorating state by asking them to try harder with their father. Linda is unaware that Willy had an affair with the Blond Woman and so, thinks the best for her. She adores him and she appreciates the hard work he has put forth despite their shabby social standings. Concluding in a way, Linda doesn't think Willy needs to change, to be more like his brother Ben.
 
Biff'- Willy's oldest son, who in the past is depicted as the popular and muscular "Hercules"(although he struggled in academics). Biff had a lot going for him and Willy on more than one occasion boasted with pride about his son, the football star. Unfortunately, Biff experienced a loss of innocence when  he witnessed his father's infidelity, which resulted in his dislike of the father he had thought so highly of. After this revelation, Biff enters a pitiful state. He doesn't believe in himself. He is not a businessman because he flits from one job to the next and believes that he will never amount to anything.

Happy- Willy's youngest son who seems to have no sense of remorse. His focus remains largely on the women he sleeps with, even if they are engaged. One might feel pity for Happy because he is depicted as the less desired son, but ,Happy cares little about the well-beings of others, especially that of his father. This Loman would rather think that everything is fine and dandy, but this doesn't overshadow the fact that he disrespectfully finds his father embarrassing. Lastly, Happy is confident and some what of a success.

Uncle Ben-Willy's wealthy, older and confident brother.Although,Ben is deceased, Willy is the only character  capable of conversing with him.Uncle Ben walked into the African jungle at the age of seventeen and walked out at the age of twenty-one a rich man after discovering diamond minds. Ben has been an absent brother, but nonetheless,  a brother who Willy looks up to and seeks advice from.

A Look at Plot:
Setting-Mainly Willy Loman's house, which is in some places open/transparent without ceilings or walls. The house is surrounded by apartments and towing buildings. Behind the fence of the house resides a cemetery . Action also takes place in the yard and the places Will visits, mainly in New York and Boston.

  Willy Loman is a struggling salesman who wants nothing more than to be "well-liked". He strives to be an important figure and hopes to die the death of a salesman. As a salesperson, Willy is an  overworked individual who comes home exhausted from his travels.When he arrives home early from his trip at the start of the play, his wife Linda encourages him to ask his boss Howard Wagner for a job at the New York office, which he slowly finds himself agreeing to. A midst his job situation Willy is dealing with his feelings toward his "no good for nothing son", Biff, who in the past had a lot going for him.On a similar note, Biff harbors negative feelings toward his father and when his mother, Linda tells him and his brother that Willy has been trying to commit suicide, through  his driving and the rubber tube, Biff is angered and believes his father to be a fake.
  Willy also struggles with reality. He tends to drift into the past when he is struggling with how to be a success or when he is trying to figure out what went wrong with him and his son. The past displays happier moments between the Loman family-laughing together or  preparing to head off to one of Biff's football games. Uncle Ben is also involved in these memories. As Willy's older successful brother, Willy seeks Ben out for advice. Willy wants to do well. To teach his sons the right things. Unfortunately, the past also displays the affair Willy had with The Woman.
    Back in the present Biff is preparing to ask Bill Oliver for a loan  and Willy is caught in his own request of asking Howard Wagner for  a better position. Neither characters receive what they came  looking for, despite the promises they both  believed would work in their favor,  and as a result, they  both come face to face with reality. Later at the restaurant Biff and Happy discuss Biff's failure/ Biff's revelation that he never wanted to be a businessman. Willy arrives thinking that his son's will have happy news to share with him to numb the fact that he is now jobless. They don't have much to offer Willy and they leave him at the restaurant. Willy finds himself in the bathroom and remembers the business trip where he was with The Woman. Biff enters the hotel room  wanting his father to fix the problem of him failing math, but experiences a loss of innocence when he discovers the women with his father.
   Later in the night Willy finds his way home, rambling about wanting to plant seeds. He and Biff have an argument. Linda is disappointed that her sons left their father, and voices her desire for wanting Biff to leave. As Biff and Willy argue about there not being a need to be "well-liked", Biff begs Willy to let him go, and cries while he does so. Willy is shocked and delighted to know that his son loves him. While the rest of his family heads to bed, Willy is content to go. He kills himself in order to be able to support his family in his death. At his funeral, only his family, Charley, and Bernard are present(not the death of a salesman). Linda cries over his grave and tells him that the mortgage had been paid off.

Style and Such:
The point of view is told through the dialogue of the characters in this play.  Miller's style flows in a comprehensible way with the use in which he encompasses the literary techniques. With  his use of  diction he relies heavily on the colloquial style, although some words may be taken as informal.This allows for his characters to appear real and honest with their everyday interactions. Syntax makes way for shorter sentences to allow Miller's points to get across.  Imagery largely centers around the setting where it describes the Loman house and character makeups. Tone of course shifts from jovial to bitter, depending on the scene. When Willy is caught in the past the memories with his family are tender, but with The Woman and Biff the tone is desperate and ashamed. In the present scenes the tone is dark because the characters have so much hope in something or other and they tend to become disappointed and outraged.

Symbols:
Gaps-The gaps in the house symbolize Willy's entrance into the past and the state of his family as they interact with those gaps. The use of these gaps portray the worn state of  the character. As a family, they are not perfect and the gaps indicate a structure(the family) that is not whole.

Seeds-When planted and watered seeds can grow and grow and grow. Willy's life is a  mess and he wants a rebirth of some kind, but everything he tries to control does not grow for him. His failure in his sons. His marriage. His job. Willy in the end is unable to sprout that plant and so the seeds symbolize his failure to grow and learn from his mistakes.

Stockings-Symbolize Willy's infidelity. He  buys his mistress stockings but his own wife takes the time to mend hers. The presence of Linda's stockings remind Willy of his straying and leads him to anger/shame.

The Tape Recorder-Ultimately establishes Willy's confrontation with reality.  The recorder bears the truth and cannot alter the past no matter how much Willy wants to alter his.


Quotes:
 In the moments before his "sacrifice" Willy is about to make a fatal decision when Ben says "It's dark there, but full of diamonds"(135). This quote is important because people have to be willing to take risks. These chances and acts of courage may be detrimental but the ending result may come out better than they had ever dreamed it to be.Full of diamonds.

In Biff's confrontation with Willy, in which Biff explains himself for taking the pen and his revelation with life Biff says, "I saw the thing that I love in this world. The work and the food and time to sit and smoke. And then I looked at the pen and said to myself, what the hell am I grabbing this for? Why am I trying to become what I don't want to be? What am I doing in this office, making a contemptuous fool of myself, when all I want is out of there, waiting for the minute I say I know who I am..."(132). There is an important message in this quote because some people who aim for success pretend to be something they're not. They commit themselves to this ideal being  which as a result hides their true nature. Biff's confidence in his less than successful position teaches the audience that image is not everything. Be the true you.

Theme:
*All thanks to Mary E.
   Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman  suggests that valuing words instead of actions leads to a delusional perception of one's conventional success; this delusion leads to a deterioration of family and one's self.

Style/Plot-The theme is dominant throughout the events that occur in this play, which are supported through diction and syntax.The colloquial diction and the short sentences are underlined and done in a way as to allow the reader to focus on the message and the circumstances where Willy contradicts himself and behaves hypocritically. Willy pumps encouragement and praise into Biff causing Biff to walk around like a mighty Hercules. But this delusion shatters after Biff witnesses the horror  of his father's affair, leading  Biff to then question his father's words  and importantly himself.Willy and Biff  rely also on  the mere promises of people who had an influence over them  in their past memories. The promises of these people, Howard's father and Bill Oliver's held no real weight, and yet, both Biff and Willy expect success from theses promises. And so when they do realize that promises are nothing but words to placate an individual for a time, they are broken and make decisions that one should find depressing. Biff has negative thoughts while Willy even to the end values words and doesn't fully comprehend the emotions of Biff's (the broken man) actions, and perceives the tears as love which then allows  Willy to be comfortable with the idea of killing himself.  The valuing of words doesn't affect only these two characters though. Linda believes so much in Willy's words that when he kills himself, she's at a loss for words because he was a success to her and in her contentment  she allowed the man to go.

Title-Willy had this idea that he was "well-liked" and when he tells Howard about the death of a salesman, one is aware that Willy expects himself to have people flocking at his own funeral. The situation is ironic because hardly anyone is at his funeral and the title helps to create the realization that words are words. You can expect one outcome and receive another, one where a quote such as Willy's "They don't even know me any more"(81) occurs.Yes, Willy died and indeed, he was a salesman. One might think they're reading about his death alone but there's so much more meaning wrapped within the title,  the meaning? Well, words do not speak over actions and for Willy the result was the real death of a salesman. 

Symbolism-Willy boasts to his family and his acquaintances about being a fine man but his actions with The Woman caused conflict to occur in his family and led to the deterioration of their  family dynamics.Because Willy was acting through this image and his actions did not add up,his life fell through, resulting in all the  success he dreamed he had and would have more of to not prosper in the seeds that he was trying to grow. The theme is also important in  the tape recorder because Willy realizes that he cannot alter his past actions, which hold the most importance because if he had stronger values other than being socially wanted he may have been a success. And despite his changing words to create the lie that he's "well-liked" along with the words  and actions of others, his lack of success is clear to him because what is in the past  and in the present is permanent.  His world is shattering and there's nothing he can do about it.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Close Reading "At Berkeley"

 
Link

     Critic Dana Stevens, a former alumna of Berkeley University, recently posted a detailed analysis of Frederick Wiseman's documentary At Berkeley concerning the interpersonal relationships between faculty and students as they interact individually and as a body to issues that impact the institution. Stevens comments expertly on the organization of the film and the events that take place within its more than four hour film span with the use of diction,  syntax, and details to aide in proving that  Wiseman's careful consideration of both faculty and students is done to show that despite the tension between the two groups, both sides exist together and react separately from the other when it comes to matters of the school , e.g., the cost of education.
 
    Stevens uses recognizable diction frequently  to indicate Frederick's Wiseman's deliberate observations of the faculty and students interactions in his film. This is done in a way that readers get the sense that Stevens notices Wiseman's techniques and wants them, as readers, to notice too. Wiseman, in his attempts at not favoring one side features events that involve both the reactions of the students and faculty.When Stevens writes, " He’s interested in the way people living and working together in large groups—a high school, a ballet company, a mental institution, a hospital—establish hierarchies, distribute power, resolve conflicts, and find ways to coexist, or at least survive," the reader becomes impacted by her use of the words distribute, resolve, and coexist. As  a community bound with the title of a university, it comes as no surprise that the individuals found within the structure must find some way to live as humanly as possible. With the tension and the disagreements and the times of harmony. Such is the human way. And what Wiseman is trying to document. Further along in this article, Stevens uses words like curiosity and eavesdrop to define  Wiseman's aim for this documentary-to make it as real as possible.As he films board room discussions to classroom discussions to student marches,  it is all done in the effort to show how the university runs. In the sentence concerning the reaction to the student led march, Stevens writes, "We’re encouraged to identify neither with the students’ half-baked radical rhetoric...nor with the administrators’ vaguely paternalistic dismissal of the protesters’ often valid outrage. " The use of diction within this sentence indicates that opinions can be formed about what is being seen, but both sides aren't shown in a good light, therefore helping to support the coexisting of the faculty and students with the use of "half-baked..." and "vaguely paternalistic".
   
    Syntax is used periodically throughout this article with the focus on  punctuation, specifically commas, questions, and dashes to add fluidity and to create pauses to allow the reader to differentiate between the faculty and the students.For example Stevens writes, "Wiseman’s camera audits a variety of graduate and undergraduate courses, in which students and teachers discuss a poem by John Donne, the design flaws of a pair of prosthetic legs, the future of space travel, and, in more than one class, the impact of the latest spate of budget cuts and fee increases on their own educations and lives." The commas not only  have a calming affect  , like ocean water rushing up to touch the edge of the sand t, but they allow for a smooth transition from the everyday student-faculty interactions to the financial costs that are splitting the two parties in half.From there Stevens uses questions  to add to the uncertainty when she describes security   reactions during the student march. She writes, "Should the head librarian shut down the library before its normal closing time? Are there enough campus police in place if the protest should turn violent?' This allows for a sense of urgency as on both sides, student and faculty, the tension is rising, but fortunately it cannot go on as Wiseman documents because the university has to run as it must.

    Details are an essential literary tool in this article because without them, Stevens would have no foundation to draw from in order to form a critic on Frederick Wiseman's At Berkeley.She gives specific dates, "In October of 2012, a year after a large student and faculty protest that nearly shut down the campus, a few hundred Berkeley students staged a march through the campus to the main library, where they occupied a large reading room for several hours, making speeches and issuing lists of demands with the passion, enthusiasm, and lack of coherence that only young lefties can muster." As apparent in the aforementioned sentence, Stevens is well informed about this march and gives her readers the specifics to help inform them from what she was able to take from Wiseman's documentary. Stevens then includes details on  how Wiseman chose to show this student and faculty outrage, helping to highlight Wiseman's intent on filming the   functioning of the university,especially with the interactions between students and faculty at Berkeley. In her efforts to educate us on Wiseman's research on Berkeley's organization, Stevens embraces his techniques and fills her articles with the details found within At Berkeley, concluding in a way to consider a possible, "imperfect, democratic institution."