Link
It's not often that a title births the need for one to do a double-take, and yet in this article's title "Death From the Skies!" by Nicholas Duchesne, such a feat is most certainly achieved, allowing one to eagerly continue reading . As of recently brown tree snakes have become a nuance to the animal species and human inhabitants of Guam, eliciting the cry for change . In an effort to decrease these lethal snakes, poison mice have been dropped into Guam's jungles to reduce and eliminate the harm that's already been done.And through his engaging style, Duchesne uses literary techniques such as: diction, details, and syntax to describe the measures that are being taken to underwhelm Guam of it's current brown tree snake population.
The use of diction in this article although largely colloquial, does at times play with the informal diction to add more emphasis to the overall message, that being the need to destroy these brown tree snakes. For example when Duchesne writes: "After the seemingly tasty snack is dropped on their arboreal doorstep, the snakes choke down their medicine," the weight of the word "arboreal" immediately catches a readers eye. In this sentence it serves to specify the habitat of these snakes. Their location is key to where these poison mice need to be dropped in order to have the desired affect. More interestingly, to describe the type of mice, in this particular sentence Duchesne writes: "Dead neonatal mice." Despite being young, these mice are most likely easily accessible and small, and therefore an important poison sacrifice adding to the effort to rid Guam of brown tree snakes. From there the everyday language becomes dominate where Duchesne plants recognizable words such as: war, invasive, and culprits to lesson ones view on brown tree snakes. They are harming the jungles and these aforementioned words help to place them in the wrong.
Without details a reader would not be able to comprehend the severity that these brown tree snakes present to Guam's native species population and economy. To alarm readers, Duchsene's details focus on numbers in order to factually relate the dangers of these snakes. He writes: "Though relatively harmless to humans, the tree-dwelling snakes have devastated Guam’s jungle ecology,driving eight species of native birds extinct. They also are the frequent culprits behind power outages on the island, which they trigger by wriggling into power substations." From this information a reader easily understands the trouble these snakes initiate and to know that they've wiped out eight bird species, creates a concern for those readers who value bird populations. And then when Duchesne relays the information that "Within 60 hours the snakes, which grow to between 3 and 6 feet in length, are dead," from the poison pills, relief is palpable and some assurance in these poison mice ensues.
Syntax works to create pauses in this article and to add more excitement, more so in the areas where Duchesne asks a question. Fragments and the occasional question in these sentences, "Their cargo? Dead neonatal mice. Their mission? Get eaten," have this build up affect. Question? Pause, and the reader considers and wonders, "Whatever could the solution be?" Also, these shorter sentences benefit in keeping the reader's focus in order to keep their attention on how these brown tree snakes are being taken out throughout the entire article. Punctuation also shows up in the position of commas, especially in this sentence, "The parachutes, however, are made of cardboard and green tissue paper, and they’re designed to get snared in tree branches." These commas create effective pauses drawing the intended message in the role that the cardboard and tissue paper play to reach the infamous brown tree snakes.
The role of diction, details, and syntax in this editorial article by Nicholas Duchesne allow for the creative message that poison-pill mice have currently been working to decrease the brown snake population in Guam. These techniques help to support this article's focus on the irritatingly harmful brown tree snakes and the even more harmful poison mice that have been dropped into Guam jungles. One is easily enraptured and interested by this article and because of these literary techniques, the reader has no issue articulating the message of this short piece.
Ludia,
ReplyDeleteYour discussion of diction shows the importance of different aspects of the situation in Guam. I enjoyed that you pinpoint how a specific word is able to change the entire focus of a sentence. By identifying both the overall diction and the excetions, you show how different styles can add to the same goal. Sometimes the exceptions can be just as important as the rule for DIDLS, and this is one of those cases.
The discussion of detail is just as strong as the discussion of diction. The emphasis on numbers is something many pieces cannot utilize because the informational focus is not there, but informational articles can sometimes use it as a shock factor and that seems to be how this article uses it. Even when the article tries to give the reader some relief, the numbers make the threat apparent. Great job analyzing the author’s choices with detail.
Again, your syntax discussion is great. The use of pauses can be the hardest part of writing things. It took me years to understand where pauses should go in my writing, using mostly commas. Making the piece flow is largely due to where the author puts commas, question marks, periods, etc. I’m glad you focused on the pauses in this section.
Great job!!
Ludia,
ReplyDeleteI loved your discussion on syntax and details. I immediately noticed the impact using questions had on driving the main point, and I'm glad you pointed it out. I also liked your discussion of the use of numbers and how it added weight to the work. I would be careful not to summarize the article in your opening paragraph, because the people reading your essay also have access to the article, and summary can be distracting. Also, in your paragraph on diction, when you addressed the phrase, "Dead neonatal mice," you discussed the impact that adding that piece of information had on the work rather than the word choice itself, which would make it fit better in your details paragraph rather than your diction paragraph. Overall, your tone is nice and formal, but in a few spots (such as your opening sentence), it gets a little casual and could be more concise. On the whole, great post!